citedby: 1413122

1 - 10 of 430 (3.38 seconds)

Documents citing Magan Bihari Lal vs State Of Punjab on 15 February, 1977

Cbi vs B. M. Sethi Etc. (Safdarjung C.G.H.S) on 13 October, 2025

9. Magan Bihari Lal vs. State The offences, involved in said matter, of Punjab (1977) 2 SCC 210 pertained to IPC only. The case did not involve offences under PC Act and therefore, said case was distinguishable on facts.

Delhi District Court Cites 208 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Premkumar Yadav vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sudha vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Kumar Mishra vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajnish Kumar vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Niraj Kumar vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Monika vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neha Yadav vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandeep Dayanand vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Praveen Kumar vs Posts on 31 January, 2025

15. Of course, it is not safe to base the conviction solely on the evidence of the handwriting expert. As held by the Supreme Court in Magan Bihari Lal v State of Punjab that:

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next