Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Amlan Jyoti Biswas vs M/O Statistics on 4 December, 2019

(vii) The applicants have countered the arguments of the respondent authorities that enblock revision to a higher pay scale would have huge financial implication in the light S.B. Vohra v. Union of India & ors. (2004) 2 SCC 150 and its ratio that financial implication vis-a-vis grant of a particular pay scale may not always be a sufficient reason and difference should be mutually discussed and tried to be resolved.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

**** vs Punjab & Haryana High Court on 10 February, 2011

(11). So far as the query raised in para (ii) is concerned, the directions issued by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in S.B. Vohra and others v. Union of India, 2000(55) DRJ 39 (CWP No.1131 of 1993) or in Mirza Zahid Beg & Ors v. Union of India & Ors. decided on 2nd May, 2008 are matter of record. S.B. Vohra and other's case (supra) also pertained to the removal of anomaly in the pay-scales of the employees of the Delhi High Court and a CWP No.15833 of 2009.doc -9- Committee of Judges had submitted its report which was accepted by Hon'ble the then Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. Consequently, the matter was referred to the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India for approval under Article 229(2) of the Constitution which was declined. The aggrieved employees invoked the writ jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court who accepted their claim.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Kant - Full Document
1