Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.56 seconds)

Uoi vs Bimla Rani on 15 September, 2015

Learned counsel for the appellant did not dispute the fact that after the remand of other cases arising out of the same acquisition vide order dated 6.8.2009 passed in RFA No. 1298 of 2003 Union of India vs Labh Singh and others, the learned reference Court has awarded compensation @ ` 192/- per square yard and against that award, the Chandigarh Administration has not filed any appeal. Hence, the prayer made in the VARINDER SINGH 2015.09.21 10:33 RFA No. 2782 of 2006 (2) I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh present appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Bindal - Full Document

Uoi vs Sawaran Singh And Anr on 15 September, 2015

Learned counsel for the appellant did not dispute the fact that after the remand of other cases arising out of the same acquisition vide order dated 6.8.2009 passed in RFA No. 1298 of 2003 Union of India vs Labh Singh and others, the learned reference Court has awarded compensation @ ` 192/- per square yard and against that award, the Chandigarh VARINDER SINGH 2015.09.21 10:33 RFA No. 2781 of 2006 (2) I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh Administration has not filed any appeal. Hence, the prayer made in the present appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Bindal - Full Document
1