citedby: 141934

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

Documents citing P. Pathrakah Nadachi vs V. Subbiah Nadar on 19 August, 1980

Mettilbai vs Balammal(Died) on 12 August, 2016

24. The learnd Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff would rely upon a decision in P.Pathrakali Nadachi Vs. V.Subbiah Nadar and Others reported in 1981(3) MLJ 463 and in paragraph No.12 of the above said judgment it is held as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Mala - Full Document

Periaswamy vs Anchalai Ammal And Anr. on 10 January, 1997

Another decision reported in P. Pathrakali Nadachi v. V. Subbiah Nadar and Ors., 1981 (1) MLJ 452 is also brought to my notice wherein it has been held that "if the order passed under Order 21 Rule 93 Civil Procedure Code is treated as a decree as provided under Order 21 Rule 103 Civil Procedure Code only an appeal will lie". Consequently, it is contended that the present Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable. I agree. It is clear that revision petition is not maintainable and only an appeal would lie to the Sub-Court, Virudhachalam against the above order.

Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Mettilbai vs Balammal(Died) on 12 August, 2016

Periaswamy vs Anchalai Ammal And Anr. on 10 January, 1997