Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.35 seconds)

Maersk Global Service Centre India ... vs Asst Cit 15(2)(2), Mumbai on 5 February, 2020

9.3 From the perusal of the annual report for the year ended 31/03/2014 of the said comparable, we find from page 707 of the paper book that the said comparable had incurred outsourcing cost of Rs. 1078.76 Crores which is included under the head "miscellaneous expenses" which goes to prove that it has got a different business model. From the various functions performed by MPS Ltd., we find that the said comparable is predominantly in the business of digital publishing which cannot be treated at par with ITeS which is the case of the assessee in ITeS segment. In this regard, we find 14 Maers k G lobal Servi ce Cen tres Ind ia Pvt. Ltd that the reliance placed by the ld. AR on the Co-ordinate Bench decision of Bangalore Tribunal in the case of Google (India) (P). Ltd., v. Dy DCIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 412/55 SOT 489 is well founded wherein it was held as under:--
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1