Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing M.Narendiran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 28 July, 2021

Unknown vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 September, 2021

In M.Narendiran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors in W.P.No.8677 of 2018 dated 13.07.2022, this Court held that since the petitioner had not been sent for mandatory training and such delay being on account of administrative reasons, could not put against the Writ Petitioner and he was directed to be ranked above the Junior Assistants who were sent for training ahead of him. The ratio in the said case, again, unfortunately does not in anyway come to the rescue of the private respondents, especially in the 40/45 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.35788 and 35800 of 2019 entirely different gamut of circumstances under which the present writ Petitions have come to be filed.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 September, 2021

In M.Narendiran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors in W.P.No.8677 of 2018 dated 13.07.2022, this Court held that since the petitioner had not been sent for mandatory training and such delay being on account of administrative reasons, could not put against the Writ Petitioner and he was directed to be ranked above the Junior Assistants who were sent for training ahead of him. The ratio in the said case, again, unfortunately does not in anyway come to the rescue of the private respondents, especially in the 40/45 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.35788 and 35800 of 2019 entirely different gamut of circumstances under which the present writ Petitions have come to be filed.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 September, 2021

In M.Narendiran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors in W.P.No.8677 of 2018 dated 13.07.2022, this Court held that since the petitioner had not been sent for mandatory training and such delay being on account of administrative reasons, could not put against the Writ Petitioner and he was directed to be ranked above the Junior Assistants who were sent for training ahead of him. The ratio in the said case, again, unfortunately does not in anyway come to the rescue of the private respondents, especially in the 40/45 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.35788 and 35800 of 2019 entirely different gamut of circumstances under which the present writ Petitions have come to be filed.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 September, 2021

In M.Narendiran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors in W.P.No.8677 of 2018 dated 13.07.2022, this Court held that since the petitioner had not been sent for mandatory training and such delay being on account of administrative reasons, could not put against the Writ Petitioner and he was directed to be ranked above the Junior Assistants who were sent for training ahead of him. The ratio in the said case, again, unfortunately does not in anyway come to the rescue of the private respondents, especially in the entirely different gamut of circumstances under which the present writ 42/47 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.35788 and 35800 of 2019 Petitions have come to be filed.
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1