Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14914 (2.59 seconds)
Documents citing Bhagwan Dass vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 9 May, 2011

Mohan S/O. Nagorao Dasre vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 December, 2021

In the case Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT) of Delhi (supra) relied upon by learned APP for the State, the Supreme Court has observed that honour killings, for whatever reasons, come within the category of rarest of rare cases and as such deserving death punishment. It is time to stamp out these barbaric, feudal practices which are a slur on our nation. This is necessary as a deterrent for such outrageous, uncivilized behaviour.
Bombay High Court Cites 90 - Cited by 0 - V K Jadhav - Full Document

State vs . 1) Sanjay Rathore on 30 September, 2014

Satish also vacated the room later on hence he has no such reason as the mother was having to save her son from punishment in case Bhagwan Das v State of NCT of Delhi (supra). Keeping in view this fact in my opinion the statement of PW18 recorded by the police cannot be relied upon under section 162(1) CrPC. There is no other evidence brought on record to prove the conspiracy. So far as the disclosure statements of accused persons are concerned no reliance can be placed upon the same as there is no recovery or discovery of fact pursuance to those disclosure statements. There is no other evidence brought on record to prove the conspiracy. In view of the above discussion in my opinion the prosecution has failed to establish this circumstance.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1) Vikas @ Kaushal on 10 January, 2012

Sessions Case No. : 14/10 Unique ID No. : 02401R1084062008 State versus 1) Vikas @ Kaushal S/o Sh. Muni Ram R/o H. No. : 271/1 Gali No. 7 Nehru Nagar, Anand Parbat Delhi 2) Raj Rani @ Munni W/o Muni Ram R/o H. No. 271/1 Gali No. 7 Nehru Nagar, Anand Parbat Delhi Case arising out of: FIR No. : 68/08 Police Station : Anand Parbat Under Section : 498A/304B/302/34 IPC Judgment pronounced on : 10.1.12 ORDER ON SENTENCE:
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Yadav vs State Govt. Of Up on 6 February, 2015

247. Mr. Sumeet Verma has vehemently urged that the judgment of the Supreme Court in (2011) 6 SCC 396, Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi) does not relate to imposition of a death sentence. According to learned counsel, this judgment is per incuriam for the reason that it ignores the Constitutional Bench pronouncement in Bachan Singh. Learned counsel would also submit that this pronouncement ought not to be considered by this court for the reason that it is a solitary case which has not been relied upon in any subsequent pronouncements of the Supreme Court except the above reference in Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral.
Delhi High Court Cites 370 - Cited by 2 - G Mittal - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Digamber Baburao Dasre on 13 December, 2021

In the case Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT) of Delhi (supra) relied upon by learned APP for the State, the Supreme Court has observed that honour killings, for whatever reasons, come within the category of rarest of rare cases and as such deserving death punishment. It is time to stamp out these barbaric, feudal practices which are a slur on our nation. This is necessary as a deterrent for such outrageous, uncivilized behaviour.
Bombay High Court Cites 90 - Cited by 0 - V K Jadhav - Full Document

Digambar S/O. Baburao Dasre vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 December, 2021

In the case Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT) of Delhi (supra) relied upon by learned APP for the State, the Supreme Court has observed that honour killings, for whatever reasons, come within the category of rarest of rare cases and as such deserving death punishment. It is time to stamp out these barbaric, feudal practices which are a slur on our nation. This is necessary as a deterrent for such outrageous, uncivilized behaviour.
Bombay High Court Cites 90 - Cited by 0 - V K Jadhav - Full Document

State vs . Gian Chand @ Rakesh on 15 September, 2016

22. Further, the conduct of PW-1 and PW-2 i.e. father of FIR No.512/03, PS Jahangir Puri                                         Page 10 of 14 victim child recorded by Ld. Predecessor on 21.01.2004 when the court found the victim child/PW-1 to be terrified and he deposed that nothing happened with him and he did not identify the accused. At the same time Ld. Predecessor recorded the conduct the PW-2 where he shouted in the examination of PW-1 that he has forgiven the accused that he had committed. My Ld. Predecessor has very rightly recorded the conduct of PW-1 and PW-2 u/s 280 Cr. PC. Further, if it is proved from the circumstances of the case that the witness has voluntarily deposed falsely then the court can rely upon his statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.PC. I find support from the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court titled as Bhagwan Dass Vs. State NCT of Delhi AIR 2011SC1863 & Bhajju @ Karan Singh Vs. State of M.P.2012CrLJ 1926. The statement of the prosecution witness who has turned hostile can be relied upon by the court to base the conviction to the extend to which witness has supported the prosecution case after setting apart the part of statement in which the witness has not supported the prosecution witness.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next