Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. vs Smt. Sangita Misra & Ors. on 4 November, 2015

Chitra vs The Additional District ... on 8 May, 2019

19. In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 http://www.judis.nic.in 27 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.”
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - G K Ilanthiraiyan - Full Document

Rahiya Syeed & Anr. vs State Of J&K; And Others on 30 November, 2018

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Dar - Full Document

Harpreet Kour And Anr vs State Of J&K And Ors on 25 June, 2019

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Dar - Full Document

Kanchan Devi And Anr vs State & Ors on 15 March, 2019

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Dar - Full Document

Karan Roy And Anr vs State & Ors on 20 March, 2019

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Dar - Full Document

Devrambhai Gagdasbhai Chaudhary vs State Of Gujarat on 5 November, 2020

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Ilesh Arjanbhai Chapla vs State Of Gujarat on 5 November, 2020

18. In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. vs. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and pending in the Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The warrants against the accused are also quashed. The police at all the concerned places should ensure that neither the petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives of the petitioner's husband are harassed or threatened nor any acts of violence are committed against them. If anybody is found doing so, he should be proceeded against sternly in accordance with law, by the authorities concerned.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kiritkumar Bhikhabhai Rabari & vs State Of Gujarat & 6 on 8 July, 2016

19.In   the   circumstances,   the   writ   petition  is   allowed.   The   proceedings   in   Sessions  Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. v.  Sangita   Gupta   and   Ors.   arising   out   of   FIR  No.   336/2000   registered   at   Police   Station  Sarojini   Nagar,   Lucknow   and   pending   in   the   Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The  warrants   against   the   accused   are   also   quashed.   The   police   at   all   the   concerned  places   should   ensure   that   neither   the   Page 5 of 6 HC-NIC Page 5 of 6 Created On Wed Jul 13 01:08:37 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/4777/2016 ORDER petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives  of the petitioner's husband are harassed or  threatened   nor   any   acts   of   violence   are  committed against them. If anybody is found  doing   so,   he   should   be   proceeded   against  sternly   in   accordance   with   law,   by   the  authorities concerned."
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Mobinabanu Sujauddin Saiyed & vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 8 July, 2016

19.In   the   circumstances,   the   writ   petition  is   allowed.   The   proceedings   in   Sessions  Trial No. 1201/2001 titled State of U.P. v.  Sangita   Gupta   and   Ors.   arising   out   of   FIR  No.   336/2000   registered   at   Police   Station  Sarojini   Nagar,   Lucknow   and   pending   in   the   Fast Track Court V, Lucknow are quashed. The  warrants   against   the   accused   are   also   Page 5 of 7 HC-NIC Page 5 of 7 Created On Wed Jul 13 01:07:50 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/3563/2016 ORDER quashed.   The   police   at   all   the   concerned  places   should   ensure   that   neither   the   petitioner nor her husband nor any relatives   of the petitioner's husband are harassed or  threatened   nor   any   acts   of   violence   are  committed against them. If anybody is found  doing   so,   he   should   be   proceeded   against  sternly   in   accordance   with   law,   by   the  authorities concerned."
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document
1   2 Next