Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Md. Abdul Samad vs General Manager, South Central Railway ... on 15 December, 2006

Smt Munni Devi vs General Manager N C Rly on 7 February, 2023

13. As regards to the relief clause no. III whereby applicant has sought a direction to the respondents to pay the compassionate allowances as per Rule 65 of Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993 to the applicant along with arrear to the applicant, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn strength from the judgment dated 15.12.2008 passed by Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 17992 of 2000 in the case of Mohammad Abdul Samad Vs. S.C. Railway represented by Sikandarabad and Others. However, a perusal of the said judgment also reveals that the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh has also taken cognizance of the fact that the benefit of compassionate allowances should not be accorded in accordance with the discretion of the competent authority and not merely on sympathetic grounds. For the sake of clarity, relevant paragraphs of the above judgments are quoted below:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ex. Sub Paras Ram vs The Union Of India & Ors. on 10 July, 2014

(2004)IIILLJ191Bom directed reconsideration of a dismissed officer's request for Compassionate Allowance for which he had applied 11 years after his dismissal. Only recently, in a case where the dismissed officer happened to apply for Compassionate Allowance 30 years after his dismissal, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside the order rejecting his application and directed reconsideration, see Md. Abdul Samad v. General Manager, South Central Railways and Ors.:
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 2 - K Gambhir - Full Document
1