Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.82 seconds)

Aklesh Kumar Dwivedi vs State Of U P And 8 Others on 8 February, 2019

The issue of speed breakers has also been considered by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmadabad in the case of Kumudben Sureshchandra, Decd. thro' Heirs Sureshchandra and others v. Jamnagar Municipal Corp.3. This case was slightly in different context but the issue with regard to speed breakers was also considered by the High Court and it was observed that under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 19494, it is the duty of the Corporation to maintain all streets within a city and the Corporation Act does not provide any provision for erecting speed breakers. Relevant part of the judgment reads as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Commissioner vs Sureshbhai Shamjibhai Sojitra & 2 on 1 May, 2017

6. Ms. Hina Desai, learned advocate for the Insurance- Corporation submits that the Insurance Company has accepted the impugned judgment and award. It is her submission that MACP No. 1596/1998 was not maintainable before the Claims Tribunal as vehicle belonging to Corporation was not involved in the accident is not accepted by the Tribunal on the basis of the decision of the Division Bench of this COurt in the case of Kumudben Sureshchandra Vs. Jamnagar Municipal Corporation and Ors. 1997(1) GLH 491. In the said decision it is observed as infra :
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A G Uraizee - Full Document
1