Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.39 seconds)

E.Ramesh vs The State Rep. By The on 3 March, 2023

7.Regarding the sanction for E.Ramesh, it was submitted by the prosecution that since he has already retired from service, there is no necessity to obtain sanction as per section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The learned counsel on record has now clarified on that preposition and submitted that nevertheless even after retiring Section 197 of Cr.P.C. must be strictly complied by the prosecution. According to him, that provision applies even to retired Government Staffs. He would straight away rely upon the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Balakrishnan Vs. State of Kerala made in Crl.A.No. 1742 of 1995. So according to him, even though such a plea was raised by him in the earlier batch of original petitions, that was not considered. So he cannot be prevented from raising the point once again before this Court.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - G Ilangovan - Full Document
1