Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Sathish Babu Sana vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 28 January, 2022

Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inx) vs Xiongwei Li on 20 September, 2022

The company is not a fly by night operator and considering the fact that it generates considerable revenue from India, it is prudent that a condition be imposed upon payment of salary, bonus, ESOPs and other benefits to the applicant by the accused company, so as to exercise some degree of control over him. There is no ground to keep the LOC open against the applicant and the LOC against the applicant is liable to be set aside. At this juncture, it is apposite to advert to the observation made by High Court of Delhi in Shri Sathish Babu Sana v. Central Bureau Of Investigation W.P.(CRL) 249/2019 decided on 28.01.2022:-
Delhi High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 1 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Prateek Chitkara vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 September, 2023

xv) Right and interest of the investing public and large amount of public funds being at stake.15 xvi) Existence of security commensurate to the amounts owed by the Petitioner.16 xvii) Effect on bilateral relations with foreign countries if loans in foreign countries are not being repaid.17 8 See Dhruv Tewari v. Directorate of Enforcement [2022 SCC Online Del 1893] 9 See Rana Ayyub v. Union of India & Anr. [2022 SCC Online Del 961] 10 See Shri Sathish Babu Sana v. Central Bureau of Investigation [2022: DHC: 332] 11 See Vishambhar Saran v. Bureau of Immigration [2021 SCC Online Cal 3074] 12 See Rahul Surana v. SFIO [MANU/TN/1605/2022] 13 See Satish Chandra Verma v. Union of India [2019(2)SCT741(SC)] 14 See Atul Punj v. IDBI Bank [2022 SCC Online Del 4063] 15 See Ghanshyam Pandey v. Union of India & Anr. [2023/DHC/001114] 16 See Ratul Puri v. Union of India & Ors. [MANU/DEOR/120412/2022] 17 See Hemanta Kumar Banka v. Union of India & Ors. [WPO No. 53/2021 dated 23rd February 2021] Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10998/2022 Page 42 of 54 By:RAHUL Signing Date:27.09.2023 15:20:25 xviii) Connection with other individuals who have already fled from India with whom the subject may be connected 18 xix) Legal proceedings in foreign countries having reached the culmination and the financial institution having participated in the proceedings therein.19 xx) Non- cooperation by the subject with the directions of the court; 20 xxi) Nature of offence whether bailable, non-bailable, cognizable, non-cognizable, compoundable non-compoundable21
Delhi High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Jagjit Singh Kochar vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 2 June, 2022

In "Satish Babu Sana Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation", W. P. (Crl.) 249/2019 decided by the Hon'ble High Court on 28.01.2022. The Hon'ble High Court observed that though in the reply filed by the respondent (CBI) it was claimed that the applicant / petitioner was an accused however till date he was neither arrested nor any charge-sheet filed against the petitioner. The respondent i.e CBI was directed to recall its request for opening the LOC against the petitioner.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1