Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.06 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Jay Ambey Filament Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India on 12 October, 2020

M/S Radha Krishan Industries vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 20 April, 2021

32 In the same vein, in Jai Ambey Filament Pvt Ltd v Union of India29, the Gujarat High Court reiterated that the subjective satisfaction as to the need for 29 2021 (44) GSTL 41 (Gujarat) 23 PART C provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on “imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be.” The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 296 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Grabdeal International Through ... vs Union Of India on 24 February, 2023

32 In the same vein, in Jai Ambey Filament Pvt Ltd v Union of India29, the Gujarat High Court reiterated that the subjective satisfaction as to the need for 2021 (44) GSTL 41 (Gujarat) provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:18:17 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:18:36 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:21:02 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:25:57 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:25:18 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

M/S Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 October, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2024 at 21:27:30 provisional attachment must be based on credible information that the attachment is necessary. This opinion cannot be formed based on "imaginary grounds, wishful thinking, howsoever laudable that may be." The High Court further held, that on his opinion being challenged, the competent officer must be able to show the material on the basis of which the belief is formed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document
1   2 Next