Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Sushma Mishra Wife Of Sri Mithilesh ... vs Sri Mithilesh Kumar Mishra Son Of Shri ... on 10 October, 2007

Ashish Mishra vs The State Of U.P And Anr. on 8 March, 2013

In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in B.S. Joshi and other (supra) case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case in which the Court should exercise discretion for allowing the application. Hence, the application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. The proceedings of complaint case no. 814 of 2010, P.S. Kotwali Shahar, District Hardoi, under sections 498A, 504 IPC and Section ¾ D.P. Act (Smt. Shushma Mishra vs. Ashish Mishra and others), are hereby quashed. No order as to costs.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mithilesh Kumar Mishra vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 12 September, 2023

4. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide Case No. 4734/2022, Computerized Case No.T2022054404734 (Mithilesh Kumar Mishra Vs. Nagesh Kumar Mishra), under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Mithilesh Kumar Mishra vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others on 12 September, 2023

4. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide Case No. 4740/2022, Computerized Case No.T2022054404740 (Mithilesh Kumar Mishra vs. Nagesh Kumar Mishra), under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Smt Ranjan Mishra vs Vidyakant Mishra And Another on 10 April, 2026

6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Sharki, Allahabad to decide the Original Suit No. 1512 of 2024 (Smt. Ranjan Mishra Vs. Vidyakant Mishra and Ors.), in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the roster, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Soni Mishra vs Sandeep Mishra on 13 March, 2015

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through this transfer petition filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fit and proper to transfer the Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No.158 of 2012 titled as Sandeep Mishra Vs. Soni Mishra, from the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga, Bihar, to the Family Court, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. We order accordingly.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1