Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Vankar R.R. vs Gujarat State Road Transport ... on 29 March, 2005

Guj. State Road Transport Corporation vs D.V. Chauhan on 21 March, 2006

12. The Division Bench decision (Coram: G.S. Singhvi & Anant S. Dave, JJ.) [Vankar R.R. v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (supra)] is relevant to the extent, parties have no disagreement, that Section 11A is confined to cases of discharge or dismissal. Still, the Court examined the case on merits, finding no fault with procedure and laws, did not interfere with the discretion exercised by the employer in the matter of imposition of punishment. The Division Bench (Coram: S.B. Majmudar & S.M. Soni, JJ.)
Gujarat High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Chief vs P on 1 July, 2011

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, further, submitted that in light of the aforesaid provision of law and in view of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of "VANKAR R.R."(Supra), the substitution of punishment by the learned Member of the Industrial Tribunal is bad in law and requires to be quashed and set aside.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Tripathi - Full Document

Divisional vs V on 14 June, 2010

3. Learned Advocate Mr. Nikunt K. Raval, for the petitioner, invites attention of this Court to a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of "VANKAR R.R. VS. GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION" reported in 2005 III LL.J. 191, wherein the learned Division Bench has held that the Labour Court/Tribunal has jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment only in the case of discharge or dismissal of the workman. The Division Bench, further, held that interference with punishment of reduction in basic pay was without jurisdiction.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Tripathi - Full Document
1