Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 152 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Haryana vs Kailashwati And Ors. on 11 September, 1979

State Of Gujarat vs Kiritbhai Prabhudas Patel on 28 April, 2003

26 - We think it useful to quote the reasoning advanced by Chief Justice S.S. Sandhawalia of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High in State of Haryana V. Smt. Kailashwati and Ors, (supra) : "Once it is held as it inevitably must be that the solatium provided for under Section 23(2) of the Act forms an integral and statutory part of the compensation awarded to a landowner, then from the plain terms of Section 28 of the Act, it would be evident that the interest is payable on the compensation awarded and not merely on the market value of the land. Indeed the language of Section 28 does not even remotely refer to market value alone and in terms talks of compensation or the sum equivalent thereto. The interest awardable under Section 28 therefore would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. It would be thus evident that the provisions of Section 28 in terms warrant and authorise the grant of interest on solatium as well."
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

State Of M.P. Through Water Resource ... vs Sardar Singh S/O Bherusingh Through Lrs ... on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Smt. Surajbai on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Shriram on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Shankarlal on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

State Of M.P. Through Water Resource ... vs Anil on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Ramchandra on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Gajraj Singh on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

State Of M.P. Through Water Resources ... vs Baje Singh on 16 September, 2020

(2001) 7 SCC 211. While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Water Resource Department vs Hemsingh S/O Ramratan Through Lrs ... on 16 September, 2020

While considering various decisions of the High Courts and approving the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in State of Haryana vs. Kailashwati, AIR 1980 P&H 117, this Court held that the interest awardable under Section 28 would include within its ambit both the market value and the statutory solatium. In view of the same, it is clear that the person entitled to the compensation awarded is also entitled to get interest on the aggregate amount including solatium.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next