Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 102 (2.45 seconds)

Ajay Ananda Nayakwadi And Others vs The Union Of India And Others on 20 March, 2020

57. As observed by the Supreme Court of India in the case of dental Council of India Vs. Subhati K.K.B Cahritable Trust (Supra) that the Education Institution should no be permitted to be commercialized for earning money but at the same time the courts can do very little in this field as it is the function of expert bodies such as the medical council of India or the Dental Council of India.
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - A S Kilor - Full Document

Chennai Non Woven'S Private Limited vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 11 July, 2019

It would normally be wise and safe for the Courts to leave the decision to experts who are more familiar with the problems they face than the courts generally can be. This view has consistently been reiterated by this Court as is evident from the judgments in State of Bihar vs. Dr. Asis Kumar Mukherjee (1975) 3 SCC 602, Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke vs. Dr. B.S. Mahajan (1990) 1 SCC 305; Dr. B.S. Mahajan, Central Areca Nut & Cocoa Mktg., & Processing Coop Ltd., vs. State of Karnataka (1997) 8 SCC 31 and Dental Council of India vs. Subharti K. K.B. Charitable Trust ((2001) 5 SCC 486.
Madras High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 3 - R Subbiah - Full Document

Brij Raj And 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. on 10 December, 2019

Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Rajeev Suri vs Union Of India on 5 January, 2021

114. To support their position, the respondents have placed reliance upon Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India & Ors.132, Shimnit Utsch India Private Limited & Anr. v. West Bengal Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Ors.133, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr.134, Directorate of Film Festivals & Ors. v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Ors.135, State of Kerala v. Joseph Antony136, G. Sundarrajan v. Union of India & Ors.137, University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao & Anr.138, Tata Iron 132 (2000) 10 SCC 664 (paras 226 to 235) 133 (2010) 6 SCC 303 (para 34, 42 to 48 and 52) 134 (2011) 7 SCC 639 (paras 36 and 37) 135 (2007) 4 SCC 737 (para 16) 136 (1994) 1 SCC 301 (para 14) 137 (2013) 6 SCC 620 (paras 200, 201, 207 to 212) 138 (1964) 4 SCR 575 (para 12) 86 & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.139, Federation of Railway Officers Association & Ors. v. Union of India140, Avishek Goenka v. Union of India & Anr.141, Dental Council of India v. Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust & Anr.142, Basavaiah (Dr.) v. Dr. H.L. Ramesh & Ors.143, K.T. Plantation Private Limited & Anr. v. State of Karntaka144, Rohit Dhupar & Ors. v. Lt. Governor & Ors.145, Cynamide India146, Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy147, Haryana Financial Corporation & Anr. v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja148, Punjab National Bank & Ors. v. Manjeet Singh & Anr.149, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. v. S.G. Kotturappa & Anr.150, Viveka Nand Sethi v. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd. & Ors.151, Ranjan Kumar Mitra v. Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd. & Ors.152, Jagjit Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.153, Chairman, Board of Mining Examination and Chief Inspector of Mines v. 139 (1996) 9 SCC 709 (para 68) 140 (2003) 4 SCC 289 (para 12) 141 (2012) 5 SCC 275 (paras 20 to 22 and 25) 142 (2001) 5 SCC 486 (paras 11 and 16) 143 (2010) 8 SCC 372 (paras 13, 20 to 22 and 38) 144 (2011) 9 SCC 1 (para 59) 145 (2009) SCCOnline Del 487 (paras 7 to 9) 146 (supra at 17, paras 27, 31 and 35) 147 (2005) 6 SCC 321 (paras 6 to 9 and 18) 148 (2008) 9 SCC 31 (paras 22 to 24, 35, 36, 40, 42, 44 and 45) 149 (2006) 8 SCC 647 (paras 17, 19 and 22) 150 (2005) 3 SCC 409 (para 24) 151 (2005) 5 SCC 337 (paras 19, 20 and 22) 152 (1997) 10 SCC 386 (para 1) 153 (2006) 11 SCC 1 (paras 14, 20, 24 to 27, 44, 46, 47 and 49) 87 Ramjee154, Sohan Lal Gupta (Dead) through LRs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 281 - Cited by 6 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

Jitendra Singh vs Union Of India And Another on 25 October, 2021

Vs. A.K. Gupta & Ors., (1979) 2 SCC 339; Rajendra Prasad Mathur Vs. Karnataka University & Anr., AIR 1986 SC 1448; Dr. Umakant Vs. Dr. Bhikha Lal Jain & Ors., AIR 1991 SC 2272; The Chancellor & Anr. Vs. Dr. Bijay Nanda Kar & Ors., (1994) 1 SCC 169; State of Orissa & Ors. Vs. Prajnaparamita Samanta & Ors., (1996) 7 SCC 106; Chairman, J & K State Board of Education Vs. Fayaz Ahmed, (2000) 3 SCC 59; and The Dental Council of India Vs. Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust & Anr., AIR 2001 SC 2151.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Dental Council Of India vs Biyani Shikshan Samiti on 12 April, 2022

11. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG also supports the submission made on behalf of the Council. Relying on the judgment of this Court in the case of Dental Council of India vs. Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust and Another1, she submits that the High Court ought not to have interfered with the impugned Notification, since the Regulations were made by the expert body in accordance with the provisions of the said Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 9 - B R Gavai - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next