citedby: 143432928

1 - 3 of 3 (0.37 seconds)

Documents citing Sethi P.V.Aged 43 Years vs Nil on 26 February, 2021

Hetu Narang vs Mohit Karak on 23 November, 2024

Provided that where a party pleading is, by reason of absence or for other good cause, unable to sign the pleading, it may be signed by any person duly authorized by him or her to sign the same or to sue or defend on his or her behalf." Reliance placed on Sethi P.V. Aged 43 Years V. Nil decided by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala on 26.02.2021.

Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shyju K vs Nil on 24 March, 2021

In the light of the dictum laid down in the above judgment, the impugned order(Ext.P4) is set aside. The Family Court shall receive the original application on file and dispose of it in accordance with law. The Original Petition is allowed.

Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Nijo Antony vs Nil on 2 July, 2021

4. Admittedly, the appellants are not in India and they are not in a position to appear before the court to take part in the proceedings u/s 10A of the Divorce Act. This Court (ourselves) in Sethi v. Nil (2021 (2) KHC 275) held that in a proceedings u/s 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, petitioners can be represented by power of attorney holder and the enquiry can be conducted through video conferencing facility.

Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Hetu Narang vs Mohit Karak on 23 November, 2024

Shyju K vs Nil on 24 March, 2021

Nijo Antony vs Nil on 2 July, 2021