Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 299 (2.49 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Orissa vs Brij Lal Misra Etc. Etc on 26 July, 1995

Ms Fountain Head Motels Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 29 March, 2025

Section 24 of LA, Act provides that any increase of value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use of which it will be put when acquired is required to be neglected while determining compensation. Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra) observed that in order to determine market value of the acquired land its consideration should be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the LA Act, 1894.
Delhi District Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Verma vs Union Of India Anr on 9 June, 2025

Section 24 of LA, Act provides that any increase of value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use of which it will be put when acquired is required to be neglected while determining compensation. Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra) observed that in order to determine market value of the acquired land its consideration should be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the LA Act, 1894.
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chander Kant vs Union Of India on 28 March, 2025

As per Section 24 of LA Act, 1894 and the settled law in case tiled Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Karigowda & Ors. (Supra) and State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra), the increase in the value of land acquired likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put once acquired is required to be neglected while determining the compensation and the consideration should alone be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4 of LA Act, 1894 except in prevailing circumstances, which are missing in the present cast. Documents Ex.PW1/1, Ex.PW1/2, Ex.PW1/3 and Ex.PW1/4 were executed after issuance of notification under Section 4 of LA Act on 10.08.2007 and accordingly cannot be relied upon to assess the actual market value of the land in question. Moreover, any of the party to the sale deed was not examined by the petitioner in order to show that that the transaction in sale deeds Ex.PW1/2, Ex.PW1/3 and Ex.PW1/4 were between the willing seller and willing purchaser and the sale was the genuine transaction. Accordingly, these Digitally signed by YADVENDER YADVENDER SINGH SINGH Page 22 of 28 Dr. Yadvender Singh /DJ-02/South/Saket/ND/28.03.2025 Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun Kumar vs Union Of India on 9 June, 2025

Section 24 of LA, Act provides that any increase of value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use of which it will be put when acquired is required to be neglected while determining compensation. Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra) observed that in order to determine market value of the acquired land its consideration should be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the LA Act, 1894.
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms S.R. Electro Steel Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 9 June, 2025

Section 24 of LA, Act provides that any increase of value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use of which it will be put when acquired is required to be neglected while determining compensation. Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra) observed that in order to determine market value of the acquired land its consideration should be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the LA Act, 1894.
Delhi District Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nitin Juneja vs Union Of India on 9 June, 2025

Section 24 of LA, Act provides that any increase of value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use of which it will be put when acquired is required to be neglected while determining compensation. Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra) observed that in order to determine market value of the acquired land its consideration should be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the LA Act, 1894.
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gulab Singh vs Union Of India on 28 March, 2025

As per Section 24 of LA Act, 1894 and the settled law in case tiled Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Karigowda & Ors. (Supra) and State of Orissa Vs. Brij Lal Mishra & Ors. (supra), the increase in the value of land acquired likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put once acquired is required to be neglected while determining the compensation and the consideration should alone be confined to the market value prevailing as on the date of the notification under Section 4 of Digitally Page 20 of 26 Dr. Yadvender Singh /DJ-02/South/Saket/ND/28.03.2025 signed by YADVENDER YADVENDER SINGH SINGH Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next