Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.19 seconds)

Smt. Sovana Dey vs Sri. Tapaban Dey on 10 August, 2022

23. I am of the considered view that since coordinate Benches of this Court in Smt. Kamala Rani Roy & Ors. v. Sri Sambhu Sen & Ors. (supra) and Golam Kibria Mallik v. Sk. amar ali & ors (supra), took one view and subsequently a coordinate bench took a different view and referred the matter to a larger bench, judicial discipline requires that I follow the earlier view which still holds the field and has not yet been differed from by a larger bench.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A Banerjee - Full Document

Rash Behari Ghosh & Ors vs Bhabani Prasad Ghosh & Ors on 10 August, 2022

17. A learned Judge of this Court in the case of Sk. Abdul Odud Ali v. Emanulla Khan and Others: 2021 SCC OnLine Cal 2078 has interpreted the aforesaid decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as laying down that the pre-condition of deposit of the transaction amount along with statutory interest of 10 per cent for maintainability of a pre-emption application applies only when the application is on the basis of vicinage.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Banerjee - Full Document

Ratan Kumar Roy & Anr vs Subhasis Dalal on 18 March, 2026

"21. I am conscious that a learned Judge of this Court in the case of SK. Abdul Odud Ali v. Emanulla Khan & Ors. (Supra) has referred to a larger bench the question as to whether or not a pre-emption application under Section 8 of the said Act on the ground of co- sharership can be rejected at the threshold for non-deposit of the entire amount that the pre-emptor is statutorily required to deposit.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashoke Kumar Bhandary @ Ashoke Bhandary vs Anupam Kanji & Ors on 22 September, 2021

In a judgment delivered on July 16, 2021 in CO No. 785 of 2021 (Sk. Abdul Odud Ali Vs. Emanulla Khan & Ors.) a coordinate bench has referred a similar issue before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice (Acting) for assignment before a Larger Bench. In view thereof, the hearing of this matter stands adjourned till the reference is answered.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H Bhattacharya - Full Document
1