citedby: 143707893

Smt. Pinki vs Shri Parveen Kumar on 23 March, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the ref- erence made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Prema Devi vs Shri Prakash Bahadur on 28 February, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the ref- erence made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suit No.54/12 - (Smt. Sumitra & Ors. vs . Shri Rashit Aggarwal & Ors.) 1 Of 25 on 11 February, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the ref- erence made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Chanmuni vs Shri Anil on 30 May, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the reference made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Bhupender Pal Singh vs Shri Bilas Narayan on 24 March, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the ref- erence made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Sanjay Kumar vs Shri Subhash Chander on 18 May, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the ref- erence made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Rani Devi vs Shri Santosh Kumar Yadav on 29 June, 2015

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the reference made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Rekha vs Shri Mohd. Shahid on 27 January, 2016

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the reference made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Meena Goel (Wife) vs Rajesh Kumar on 30 January, 2016

17. Now, the question is which of the judgments ought to be followed awaiting answer to the reference made by the Supreme Court in Pushpa & Ors. (supra).

Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hem Kumari Devi & Ors. vs . Indra Pal Singh & Ors. on 6 August, 2018

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE Though, an issue of contributory negligence has also been raised by Ld. Counsels for the respondents and it is their submission that since the deceased himself was negligent in boarding the offending bus and had fallen on the road due to his own negligence, the compensation payable to the petitioners is required to be reduced in proportion to the contributory negligence which may be attributed to the deceased. However, in view of the judgments being relied upon Ld. Counsel for the petitioners in the cases of Bhaskaran Vs. Ravindran & Ors., 1990 ACJ 1032, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pushpa & Ors, 2012 LawSuit (Del) 1024 and Meera Devi & Anr. Vs. H.R.T.C. & Ors., 2014 LawSuit (SC) 168, this submission of Ld. Counsels for the respondents is also not tenable.

Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results