Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. O.N.G.C. Ltd vs Commnr. Of Customs, Mumbai on 24 August, 2006

M/S Korba Power Limited vs Haryana Electricity Regulatory ... on 23 December, 2025

40. Thus, where there is an order for restitution by way of return or restoration of some specific money or thing to its rightful owner, the direction to pay interest must follow. It is noteworthy that in the case of O.N.G.C. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs Mumbai, JT 2007 (10) SC 76 (referred by the Supreme Court in the above noted judgment), the application for payment of interest was filed for the first time before the Supreme Court during the pendency of the appeal, which was entertained and allowed by the Supreme Court.
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Jk Minerals vs Madhya Prdesh Electricity Regulatory ... on 19 January, 2026

In the case of O.N.G.C. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs Mumbai, JT 2007 (10) SC 76, (para 6), the facts were that the assessment orders passed in the Customs Act creating huge demands were ultimately set aside by this Court. However, during pendency of appeals, a sum of Rs.54,72,87,536/- was realized by way of custom duties and interest thereon. In such circumstances, an application was filed before this Court to direct the respondent to pay interest on the aforesaid amount w.e.f. the date of recovery till the date of payment. The appellants relied upon the judgment in the case of South Eastern Coal Field Ltd.
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.V.Thomas vs The State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2011

Subsequently, the licence was renewed upto 31/03/2011. It is argued that in view of remittance of arrear of fee for the last 8 years, the renewal of licence shall be deemed to be effected with retrospective effect from 2003 onwards. If that be so, at the relevant time of seizure, the petitioner was having the required licence to transport the rice. The learned counsel cited O N G C Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (2006 (7) SCC 403). Thus, the appellate authority miserably failed to consider the question in controversy whether the petitioner had licence to transport rice at the relevant time, in its correct O.P.C.No.1418 of 2011 5 perspective.
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. on 19 September, 2014

In the case of O.N.G.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs Mumbai, JT 2007 (10) SC 76 (para 6). The facts were that the assessment orders passed in the Customs Act creating huge demands were ultimately set aside by Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, during pendency of appeals, a sum of Rs. 54,72,87,536/- was realized by way of custom duties and interest thereon. Under the circumstances an application was filed before Hon'ble Supreme Court to direct respondent to pay interest on the aforesaid amount w.e.f date of recovery till date of payment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document
1   2 3 Next