Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.92 seconds)
Documents citing Shashi Bhushan & Ors. vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 31 May, 2012

Khushnuma vs Arvind Kumar on 26 August, 2015

8.Since the driving licence which was available on the record was valid for driving LMV only and not LMV (Transport) and no other licence was produced by the insured, it has to be held that the driver possessed valid driving licence to drive Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) only and not a transport vehicle. Thus, in view of the judgment in Shashi Bhushan & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., MAC APP.517/2007, decided on 31.05.2012; National Insurance Co. v. Kusum Rai, (2006) 4 SCC 250; and New India Assurance Company Limited v. Roshanben Rahemansha Fakir & Anr., (2008) 8 SCC 253, the driver was not competent to drive the vehicle involved in the accident.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Malti Devi vs Vijay Kumar on 8 September, 2015

8.Since the driving licence which was available on the record was valid for driving LMV only and not LMV (Transport) and no other licence was produced by the insured, it has to be held that the driver possessed valid driving licence to drive Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) only and not a transport vehicle. Thus, in view of the judgment in Shashi Bhushan & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., MAC APP.517/2007, decided on 31.05.2012; National Insurance Co. v. Kusum Rai, (2006) 4 SCC 250; and New India Assurance Company Limited v. Roshanben Rahemansha Fakir & Anr., (2008) 8 SCC 253, the driver was not competent to drive the vehicle involved in the accident.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh vs Haider Ali on 23 January, 2016

8.Since the driving licence which was available on the record was valid for driving LMV only and not LMV (Transport) and no other licence was produced by the insured, it has to be held that the driver possessed valid driving licence to drive Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) only and not a transport vehicle. Thus, in view of the judgment in Shashi Bhushan & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., MAC APP.517/2007, decided on 31.05.2012; National Insurance Co. v. Kusum Rai, (2006) 4 SCC 250; and New India Assurance Company Limited v. Roshanben Rahemansha Fakir & Anr., (2008) 8 SCC 253, the driver was not competent to drive the vehicle involved in the accident.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Parsan & Ors. on 20 May, 2015

8. Since the driving licence which was available on the record was valid for driving LMV only and not LMV (Transport) and no other licence was produced by the insured, it has to be held that the driver possessed valid driving licence to drive Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) only and not a transport vehicle. Thus, in view of the judgment in Shashi MAC. APP. No. 532/2012 Page 6 of 8 Bhushan & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., MAC APP.517/2007, decided on 31.05.2012; National Insurance Co. v. Kusum Rai, (2006) 4 SCC 250; and New India Assurance Company Limited v. Roshanben Rahemansha Fakir & Anr., (2008) 8 SCC 253, the driver was not competent to drive the vehicle involved in the accident.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 3 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Manjula vs The Secretary on 22 January, 2021

10.From the materials available on record it is seen that it is the contention of the appellants that the deceased was a minor girl aged 3 years and died due to the injuries sustained by her in the accident that occurred on 26.03.2014. The Tribunal considering the judgment of the High Court of Delhi reported in 2012 (2) TNMAC 60 (Delhi), [Shashi Bhushan & Others Vs. National Insurance Company Limited & Others], granted a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.75,000/- towards future 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.3754 of 2019 prospects and Rs.75,000/- towards non-pecuniary damages. The amounts arrived by the Tribunal for death of minor is meagre.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V M Velumani - Full Document

The Branch Manager vs Pandi on 26 November, 2012

10. The learned counsel for the claimant submits that the deceased is aged about 10 years and the boy was studying in the 4th standard and he was an active and brilliant student. The parents of the deceased had a lot of expectations about their deceased sons' bright future. The learned counsel further submits that the Tribunal had not granted adequate compensation to the claimants. The learned counsel, in support his contentions, had cited the following judgments reported in 2012(2) TN MAC 60 (Del.) in Shasi Bhushan and others Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and others. Motor Accident Claim-compensation-quantum-determination-fatal accident- deceased, aged 6 years, a school going girl-Rs.2,52,000/- awarded by the Tribunal, if exorbitant and excessive. In case of school going child, parents entitled to compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- i.e., Rs.2,25,000/- towards loss of dependancy + Rs.75,000/- towards future prospectus (supreme court followed)- in such circumstances compensation of Rs.2,52,000/- liable to be enhanced to Rs.3,75,000/-.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - C S Karnan - Full Document

Nasim Ahamad vs Smt. Shasi Pandey And 5 Others on 9 April, 2018

2. This First Appeal From Order has been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to 'Act') by the appellant, against award dated 20.11.2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, court no.01, Ballia in Motor Accident Claim Petition no.13 of 2014, Smt. Shashi Pandey and others versus National Insurance Company Ltd. and others, whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed for compensation amount Rs.1,45,000/- along with accruing interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of presentation of the claim petition.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1