Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.38 seconds)Documents citing
Sohanlal Ruia And Anr. vs Kedarnath Purushottamdas And Co. ... on 18 February, 1969
Nalini Janardhanan vs Elamana Chinnammu on 30 July, 2007
22. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Sohanlal v.
Kedarnath (AIR 1969 Calcutta 516) has held that mere physical
presence of the lawyer without preparedness to conduct the case will
not constitute appearance for the purpose of Order XVII Rule 2 or Rule
R.Ravindran vs M.Rajamanickam on 3 December, 2010
We can have those decisions in Kunjannam v. A.Issac, 1961 Ker LT 653, Abdulla Haji v. Mammunhi Barikat, 1969 Ker LT.433, Natesa Thevar v. Vairavan Servai, AIR 1955 Madras 258, Gulvir Singh v. Tara Chand, AIR 1982 Allahabad 250, Thummala Suryamma v. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, AIR 1975 Andh Pra 90, Marothu Suryarao v. Paluri Peddiyya, AIR 1967 Andh Pra 152, Muzammal Hussain v. Chaganlal Jain, AIR 1967 Assam 14, Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. Prakash Chand Agarwal, AIR 1970 Orissa 149, Sohanlal Ruia v. Kedarnath Purushottamdas and Co., AIR 1969 Cal 516, Gopi Kisan v. Ramu, AIR 1964 Rajasthan 147 (FB), M.Agaiah v. Mohammed Abdul Kareem, AIR 1961 Andh Pra 201 (FB) and Sankara Pillai v. Balakrishnan Nair, (1988) 1 Ker LT 339.
1