Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (2.42 seconds)Documents citing
State Of U.P./District Judge vs Arun Kumar Yadava Son Of Sri Ram Autar ... on 17 August, 2007
Unknown vs 8.2009 He Recorded The Statement Of The ... on 8 October, 2012
5. There being no evidence on the record to
establish "negligence" or "rashness" in driving the
truck on the part of the respondent, it cannot be
said that the view taken by the High Court in
acquitting the respondent is a perverse view. To us
it appears that the view of the High Court, in the
facts and circumstances of this case, is a
State v. Tarun Yadav
FIR No. 150/2009 P.S.: Chhawla Page 15 of 24
reasonably possible view. We, therefore, do not
find any reason to interfere with the order of
acquittal. The appeal fails and is dismissed. The
respondent is on bail. His bail bonds shall stand
discharged".
Vide This Judgment This Court Shall ... vs State Of on 31 August, 2012
5. PW-1 Ct. Anil Kumar deposed that on 08.07.2006 he was posted as
constable at PP Sarai Kale Khan in PS HNDIN. On that day, he was on
patrolling duty in the area of ring road, I P Park, bus stop, gate no.1. At
State v. Arun Kumar Yadav U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act
FIR No.487/06, PS HNDIN
3
about 7.20 pm, one secret informer met him and informed him that one
person was present at footpath near gate no.2 with an illegal knife. On
that information, he requested 4-5 public persons to join the investigation
and raiding party but none agreed and left the spot without disclosing
their names and addresses. At about 7.30 pm, he reached there and tried
to overpower the accused, who tried to run away towards gate no.3 I P
Park, but after chasing 20-25 steps, he was apprehended. On search of
the accused, one buttondar knife was recovered from the back pocket of
his trousers.
State vs . Sonu Kumar Yadav on 26 October, 2013
In these circumstances, the possibility that
accused had been apprehended by crowd under confusion can not be ruled
SC No. 151/13 Page 6 of 7
State Vs. Sonu Kumar Yadav
out.
Varun Kumar Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 1 July, 2025
18. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the instant application is allowed. Consequently, cognizance and summoning order dated 20.5.2023 and the proceedings of Special ST no.694 of 2023 (State Vs Varun Kumar Yadav), arising out of Case Crime No.1481 of 2020 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 pending in the court of Special Judge (E. C. Act), Allahabad are hereby quashed.
Ankit Yadav And 8 Others vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others on 1 September, 2025
In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.293 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Ankit Yadav and others) and Session Trial No.454 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Arjun Yadav), under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 452, 504, 506, 307, IPC, Police Station Babina, District Jhansi, arising out of Case Crime No.112 of 2021, pending before the Special Judge (E.C. Act), Jhansi, are hereby quashed.
Arun Yadav @ Pappu vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 5 July, 2024
It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceedings of criminal case No.1851/2016, State Vs Arun Yadav Pappu pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate Lucknow disposal of instant petition before this Hon'ble Court, as it is desirable in the interest of justice."
Arun Kumar Yadav And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 15 May, 2026
10. For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the Criminal Case No. 14173/2025 State of U.P. Vs Arun Kumar Yadav & others and summoning order dated 29/07/2025 as well as charge sheet dated 07/07/2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 15/2025, Under Section- 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S. (Corresponding Section- 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C.) and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Amethi pending before Civil Judge (Awar Khand) / F.T.C. (Crime against Women) Sultanpur, shall remain stayed so far as applicants are concerned.
Arun Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Another on 7 January, 2021
b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to stay the effect of order dated 11.2.2020 passed by respondent no.1 in Case No. 03659/ 2018 with computer case no. D201814360003659 (State vs. Arun Kumar Yadav) till pending of present writ petition."
Ramdhani And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 September, 2024
2. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 24.05.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court no.15, Allahabad in S.T. No.221 of 2020 (State vs. Arun Kumar @ Subhash Yadav and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.344 of 2020, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)Va of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Utraon, District Allahabad, whereby appellants have been summoned by the court concerned in exercise of powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C.