Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Sanjay Chug vs Opender Nath Ahuja & Anr. on 6 January, 2014

Aneesh Bansal & Anr vs Veerender Khatri & Ors on 21 September, 2016

15. Reference may be had to the judgment of this court in the case of Sanjay Chug vs. Opender Nath Ahuja & Anr. (supra). That was a case RC.REV.453/2016 Page 7 where the court came to the conclusion that the sons of the landlord were in possession of commercial accommodation from where they were operating their own business and that they needed an additional accommodation for setting up a new business or expanding the existing business. The judgment would not help the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J Nath - Full Document

Sh. S. Harbant Singh Sahni vs Sh. Roshan Lal on 8 December, 2014

30. Ld. Counsel for respondent has placed reliance upon judgment delivered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases of Santosh Devi Soni vs. Chand Kiran, JT 2000 (3) SC 397; Shiv Sarup Gupta vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta, (1999) 6 SCC 222; M.M. Quasim vs. Manohar Lal Sharma & Ors., AIR 1981 SC 1113; P.S. Devgun vs. S.P. Walia, 1975 RLR E­156/2013 Page 20/28 (Note) 71; Liaq Ahmed & Ors. vs. Habeeb­ur­Rehman, (2000) 5 SCC 708; Charan Dass Duggal vs. Brahma Nand, (1983) 1 SCC 301; Precision Steel & Engineering Works & Anr. Vs. Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal and Kailash Chand vs. Sakhir Chand, 1984 RLR (Note) 58 and judgment delivered by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the cases of Bharat Glass & Plywood Co. vs. Sushan Pal Soni in R.C. Rev. No. 46/2013, decided on 21.03.2014; Giri Raj vs. Sheela Devi in R.C. Rev. No. 328/2012, decided on 25.02.2014; Prit Pal Singh vs. Ramesh Kumar Dora in R.C. Rev. No. 444/2012, decided on 06.01.2014; Sanjay Chug vs. Opender Nath Ahuja & Anr. in R.C. Rev. No. 100/2013, decided on 06.01.2014; Chaman Lal vs. Batuk Prasad Jaitly in R.C. Rev. No. 171/2011, decided on 02.01.2014; Davinder Pal Singh & Ors. vs. M/s Pritam Prakash Dawar & Sons (HUF) in R.C. Rev. No. 222/2013, decided on 06.11.2013; Krishan Kumar Bhasin & Ors. vs. M/s Pritam Prakash Dawar & Sons (HUF) in R.C. Rev. No. 223/2013, decided on 06.11.2013; Khem Chand & Ors. vs. Arjun Jain & Ors. in R.C. Rev. No. 442/2012, decided on 13.09.2013; Deepak Gupta vs. Sushma Aggarwal in R.C. Rev. No. 180/2013, decided on 24.07.2013; E­156/2013 Page 21/28 Vijay Kumar Jewelers & Ors. vs. Smt. Sunita Soni & Ors. in R.C. Rev. No. 225/2012, decided on 12.12.2012; Sri Kishan vs. Rohitas Saini in R.C. Rev. No. 114/2010, decided on 02.03.2012; Mohd. Jafar & Ors. vs. Nasra Begum in R.C. Rev. No. 279/2011, decided on 09.07.2012; Ganga Dass vs. D.N. Singhal & Anr. in R.C. Rev. No. 276/2012, decided on 09.07.2012; Shri Nem Chand Jain vs. Shri Sanjay Kumar Jain & Anr. in R.C. Rev. No. 265/2012, decided on 02.07.2012; M/s S.K. Seth & Ors. vs. Vijay Bhalla in R.C. Rev. No. 268/2012, decided on 25.07.2012; Ram Devi vs. Raj Rani & Anr. in R.C. Rev. No. 381/2012, decided on 14.12.2012; Prahlad Rai Mittal vs. Smt. Rita Rani in R.C. Rev. No. 102/2012, decided on 21.12.2012; Indermani vs. Ajay Prakash Gupta in R.C. Rev. No. 563/2012, decided on 26.11.2012; Narender Kumar Manchanda & Anr. vs. Hemant Kumar Talwar in R.C. Rev. No. 107/2012, decided on 10.12.2012; M/s Gopal Dass & Sons vs. Dineshwar Nath Kedar in R.C. Rev. No. 240/2011, decided on 21.12.2012; Tarun Pahwa vs. Pradeep Makin in R.C. Rev. No. 75/2012, decided on 21.12.2012; Kiran Sachdeva & Anr. vs. Pushpa Devi & Anr. in R.C. Rev. No. 216/2012, decided on 21.12.2012; Sunil Kumar vs. Sahi E­156/2013 Page 22/28 Ram in R.C. Rev. No. 41/2011, decided on 05.10.2011 and Rajbir Pal & Anr. vs. Kanwar Pratap Singh in R.C. Rev. No. 209/2010, decided on 12.10.2011.
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Satya Prakash & Sons (Firm) & Anr. vs Narain Kumar & Sons (Huf) on 15 January, 2016

40. Two of the judgments which have been relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners are rendered by the Single Judge of this Court. These are case titled Sanjay Chugh v. Opender Nath Ahuja, 207 (2014) DLT 271 and Sudershan Kumar v. Harish Chandra Garg, 2014 (143) DRJ 489. In both these judgments, no doubt the leave to defend has been granted as per the facts of those two cases. I have gone through the said two judgments.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - V K Shali - Full Document

S. Amolak Singh Correct Name Amolak Raj ... vs Narender Kumar Dang on 3 November, 2017

In addition, reliance is placed on (i) Chetan Dass Gupta Vs. Sushila Devi 1983 (1) RCR (Punjab & Haryana) 585 to contend that without the respondent tenant being under threat of eviction from his own landlord is not entitled to evict his own tenant; (ii) Inderjeet Kaur Vs.Nirpal Singh (2001) 1 RC.REV.628/2015 Page 11 of 19 SCC 706; and, (iii) Sanjay Chug Vs. Opender Nath Ahuja 2014 SCC OnLine Del 80 to contend that the present is a case of requirement for additional accommodation and leave to defend is to be necessarily granted.
Delhi High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 1 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1   2 3 Next