citedby: 14450

1 - 10 of 26 (1.49 seconds)

Documents citing Hari Kishore Sharma vs The State Of Raj & Ors on 21 October, 2011

Manilal Haridas Patel vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 11 July, 2017

Similarly, it is submitted, in a Rajasthan case, both the single Judge and the Division Bench have held that all the retirees would have to be given a fresh option as the notification giving the option only to some retirees are clearly discriminatory. This view has, it is urged, again been upheld by this Hon'ble Court by dismissing the Special Leave Petition No. 7192/ 87 or the Government by order dated 11887.

Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Deoram V Bavbande vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shailaja N Derebail vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dhananjay Tatyasaheb Jadhav vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A R Gajankush vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sudhir Kumar vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Susila Rao vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vihang Narayan Nandgaonkar vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanju Jaipalsingh Verma vs Bhabha Atomic Research Centre on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S P Anantwar vs D/O Atomic Energy on 30 July, 2024

16. Mr. Nagrani placed reliance on the decision of the Madras Bench of Tribunal in the case of S. Subbaih Vs. D/o Atomic Energy in OA No.1766/2013 dated 31.03.2015 and order dated 05.01.2017 in which it was held that restriction for six months was without authority. He placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hari Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2011 SCC Online Rajasthan dated 21.10.2011 and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam and Others Vs. Bachan Singh, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 463.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 3 Next