Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 83 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Sukhjeet Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 27 August, 2019

Harjinder Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 1 August, 2022

Pursuant to notice of motion order, reply has been filed by respondent No.4 in the court today which is taken on record. As per the reply filed, petitioners No.10, 18, 19 and 20, who were appointed as SPOs on daily wage in the year 1993, 1994 and 1996, were absorbed as Constable in the year 1999 and 2002 and therefore, they are already covered under the Old Pension Scheme as applicable to the employees recruited prior to 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 05-08-2022 00:29:01 ::: CWP No.2445 of 2022 (O&M) -2- 01.01.2004. As regards other petitioners, it is stated that their cases are squarely covered vide judgments passed by this Court CWP No.9936 of 2017 decided on 15.02.2018 titled as Sukhjeet Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others and CWP No.7127 of 2019 decided on 01.04.2019 titled as Jarnail Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Thakur - Full Document

Nachhater Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Others on 3 September, 2020

Petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to count the daily wage service as Special Police Officer (SPO) rendered by them before their regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.9936 of 2017 (Sukhjeet Singh and others Vs. The State of Punjab and others) decided on 15.02.2018 (Annexure P-7) and order dated 01.04.2019 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.7127 of 2019 (Jarnail Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others), Annexure P-8. The said orders, which have been passed by this Court, stand duly complied with by the respondents vide orders dated 11.12.2018 and 11.07.2019 , Annexures P-9 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2020 22:15:48 ::: CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13421 OF 2020 :{ 2 }:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Khazan Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 27 August, 2020

The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court for issuance of mandamus directing the respondents to count their daily wages as Special Police Officer (SPO), rendered before their respective regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits in consonance with the judgment rendered in CWP No. 2371 of 2010, titled as Harbans Lal vs. The State of Punjab and ors., decided on 31.08.2010 and also in view of the law laid down in CWP No. 9936 of 2017, titled as Sukhjeet Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 15.02.2018, and the order dated 01.04.2019 passed in CWP No. 7127 of 2019 titled as Jarnail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others (Annexures P-7 and P-8 respectively). In the alternative, the petitioners have also prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to decide legal notice dated 28.05.2020 (Annexure P-11) in the light of the mandate of this Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Puri - Full Document

Jugraj Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 17 August, 2020

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and while refraining from making any expression as regards merits of the case, the 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-09-2020 20:26:54 ::: (2) CWP-11951-2020 (O&M) petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Punjab to get the matter examined and to dispose of the written notice dated 5.3.2020 (Annexure P-10) in accordance with law and in accordance with settled position while considering the law laid down in Harbans Lal's case (supra) and Sukhjeet Singh's case (supra).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - G S Gill - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next