Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing Mritak Charam Sodhan Cooperative ... vs Municipal Coporation Of Delhi on 12 October, 2007

Noor Jahan W/O Late Sh. Nisar Ahmed vs New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) on 21 May, 2011

The right to carry on trade or business mentioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasizes several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organizations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

District : New Delhi vs Ndmc on 30 April, 2012

4 of page 16 out of his way to find a regular market. The right to carry on trade or business mentioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasizes several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organisations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities. Based on the findings NASVI and SEWA advocated a national workshop on problems faced by street vendors. This was held on 29­30 May 2001 at Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi and was jointly organised by SEWA and the Ministry of Urban Development. The findings of the above mentioned survey was a central theme of this workshop. The minister for urban affairs announced on the second day that a National Task Force on Street Vendors with the objective of drafting a National Policy on Street Vending would be set up. This policy was drafted by September 2002 and in January 2004 the union cabinet accepted it. The government changed subsequently but the new gov­ ernment (headed by Sh. Manmohan Singh as PM) accepted the need for a national policy for street vendors. The task of finalizing this and also drafting a model law was given to the National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. A new version of the policy was framed which was almost similar to the earlier one.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

8555 vs New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) on 21 May, 2011

The right to carry on trade or business mentioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasizes several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organizations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities. Based on the findings NASVI and SEWA advocated a national workshop on problems faced by street vendors. This was held on 29­30 May 2001 at Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi and was jointly organized by SEWA and the Ministry of Urban Development. The findings of the above mentioned survey was a central theme of this workshop.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohan Kumar S/O Ba Kishan vs Ndmc on 13 July, 2011

(3) Public advertisements will be issued by the Committee in local newspapers having wide circulation inviting claims from squatters/hawkers who have not preferred claims or filed proceedings in court by a date to be stipulated therein, such claims must of course be consistent with the eligibility criteria laid down in Resolution No. 28. In addition to such public advertisement to be issued in newspapers of different languages such as English, Hindi, Urdu, South­Indian languages, etc., to be determined by the Committee, handbills and pamphlets shall also be printed and distributed and pasted in different parts of the five zones selected for, squatting/hawking inviting claims by the stipulated date. The advertisements/pamphlets, etc. will also cover claimants falling within directions (1) and (2) above;
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Kumar S/O Sh. Kishan vs Ndmc on 19 November, 2011

The right to carry on trade or business men­ tioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasises several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S/O Late Sh. G.L. Chauhan vs Ndmc & Others on 28 November, 2011

The right to carry on trade or business men­ tioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasises several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organisations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities. Based on the findings NASVI and SEWA advocated a national workshop on problems faced by street vendors.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Anju W/O Late Sh. Lekh Raj vs Ndmc on 18 December, 2010

(g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasises several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organisations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities. Based on the findings NASVI and SEWA advocated a national workshop on problems faced by street vendors. This was held on 29­30 May 2001 at Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi and was jointly organised by SEWA and the Ministry of Urban Development. The findings of the above mentioned survey was a central theme of this workshop. The minister for urban affairs announced on the second day that a National Task Force on Street Vendors with the objective of drafting a National Policy on Street Vending would be set up. This policy was drafted by Sep­ tember 2002 and in January 2004 the union cabinet accepted it. The government changed subsequently but the new government (headed by Sh. Manmohan Singh as PM) accepted the need for a national policy for street vendors. The task of finalizing this and also drafting a model law was given to the National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. A new version of the policy was framed which was almost similar to the earlier one.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R/O A 122 vs Ndmc on 18 December, 2010

The right to carry on trade or business mentioned in Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitu­ tion, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasises several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad. It soon emerged as an independent federation of street vendors' organisations. In 1999, NASVI initiated a survey on street vending in seven cities. Based on the findings NASVI and SEWA advocated a national workshop on problems faced by street vendors. This was held on 29­30 May 2001 at Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi and was jointly organised by SEWA and the Ministry of Urban Development. The findings of the above mentioned survey was a central theme of this workshop.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Gupta S/O Sh. Shiv Shankar Gupta vs Ndmc on 24 December, 2010

(g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied on the ground that the streets are meant exclusively for passing or re­passing and no other use (Sodhan Singh vs NDMC, 1989). The judgment is significant because it emphasises several important aspects of street vending and use of public space. It notes the positive role of street vendors in providing essential commodities to common people at affordable prices and at convenient places. Moreover, street vending, if regulated, cannot be denied merely on the ground that pavements are meant exclusively for pedestrians. The most important aspect is that street vendors are exercising their constitutional right to carry out trade or business hence it should be regulated properly and not abolished. Despite this judgment, municipal authorities continued to harass street vendors. In 1998, the National Alliance of Street Vendors of India (NASVI) was formed in Ahmedabad.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next