Anurag Agrawal And Another vs Shri Upendra Nath Bansal on 24 September, 2010
The present case is not for release of residential purpose. Release has been sought for business purpose and the building is occupied by the tenant for commercial purpose. The factors to be considered for business purpose given in Rule 16 (2). Rule 16 (2) do not contain any such clause like clause (d) of Rule 16 (1). This Court in the case of Rafi Ullah vs. Dr. Om Hari and another reported in 2006 (4) ARC 469 (para 15) has held thus: