Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Tata Sons Limited And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 20 January, 2015

Subway Systems India Private Limited ... vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 11 August, 2016

10th August 2016 ::: Uploaded on - 16/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 17/08/2016 00:04:04 ::: Mayhco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt Ltd | Subway Systems (I) Pvt Ltd ASWP9175-2015+OSWP497-2015-F3.doc decision was arrived at in the present writ proceedings, which it had by then already filed.42 Respondent No. 4 did not accept this request but passed an ex parte assessment order, including interest and penalties Rs.17,98,988/-43 in view of the decision of this Court in Tata Sons Limited v State of Maharashtra.44 On 31st March 2015, the 4th Respondent issued a Notice of Demand in this amount.45 VI. SUBMISSIONS AND FINDINGS IN SUBWAY
Bombay High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - G S Patel - Full Document

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. ... vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary ... on 11 August, 2016

10th August 2016 ::: Uploaded on - 16/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 17/08/2016 00:03:55 ::: Mayhco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt Ltd | Subway Systems (I) Pvt Ltd ASWP9175-2015+OSWP497-2015-F3.doc decision was arrived at in the present writ proceedings, which it had by then already filed.42 Respondent No. 4 did not accept this request but passed an ex parte assessment order, including interest and penalties Rs.17,98,988/-43 in view of the decision of this Court in Tata Sons Limited v State of Maharashtra.44 On 31st March 2015, the 4th Respondent issued a Notice of Demand in this amount.45 VI. SUBMISSIONS AND FINDINGS IN SUBWAY
Bombay High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - G S Patel - Full Document

M/S Poonam Roofing Products Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 16 January, 2018

e. Having transferred the right to use the goods during the period for which it is to be transferred, the owner cannot again transfer the same rights to others. 4.1 Learned Counsel for the appellant have argued that in case of Tata Sons (Supra), Hon'ble High Court had not applied the test laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court by observing as follows: -
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Poonam Roofing Products Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 16 January, 2018

e. Having transferred the right to use the goods during the period for which it is to be transferred, the owner cannot again transfer the same rights to others. 4.1 Learned Counsel for the appellant have argued that in case of Tata Sons (Supra), Hon'ble High Court had not applied the test laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court by observing as follows: -
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1