Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.07 seconds)

Wockhardt Ltd. vs Hetero Drugs Ltd. And Ors. on 8 September, 2005

6. The respective learned Counsel had elaborately argued on the law of process patent, product patent as well on the manufacturing licence including the grant of EMR. On a similar challenge, a learned single Judge of this Court in the decision in "Nevertis AG and Anr. v. Adarsh Pharma and Anr. 2004 (29) PTC 108 (MAD)", while considering the scope of EMR, held "that the grant of EMR is only by way of an interim measure and the same is granted to an applicant who has filed the patent claim. The learned Judge also held that though Section 24-A of the Patents Act, 1970 specifically excludes the operation of Section 12(1) of the act alone, inasmuch as the said section provides for an examination under Section 13, the requirements of Section 13 also shall stand excluded for the purpose of Chapter IV-A of the Act. The learned Judge also held that in view of the above exclusion of not only Section 12(1) but also Section 13, Section 64(1)(e) of the Act cannot be pressed into service to invalidate the EMR." Based on the above findings, the learned Judge proceeded to decide the issue and ultimately the applications for interim injunction were allowed.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 7 - D Murugesan - Full Document
1