Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.66 seconds)
Documents citing Amiruddin vs State (Delhi Admn.) on 17 September, 2019

Aslam @ Bhaiyyu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 July, 2024

3] M.Cr.C. No.27593 of 2024 is the third bail application filed by applicant Aslam @ Bhaiyyu, and M.Cr.C. No.24509 of 2024 is the first bail application filed by the applicant Shabuddin (Shahbuddin) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as they are implicated in connection with Crime No.197/2023, registered at Police Station Khajrana, District Indore (MP) for offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 294, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicants are in custody since 18.08.2023 and 05.03.2023 respectively. 4] It is alleged against the applicants that both of them inflicted knife injuries on the deceased's thigh and back, resulting in his death. 5] Counsel for the applicants has emphasized that even assuming the case of the prosecution to be correct, there was no intention on the part of the applicants to cause the death of the deceased Sahil, as the injuries were inflicted on the lower limbs only. 6] In support of his submissions, Shri Naveen Kumar Singh counsel for the applicant Shahbuddin has also relied upon the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Harjinder Singh Alias Jinda Vs. Delhi Administration, reported as 1968 AIR 867, and Amiruddin Vs. State (Delhi Admn.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Shabuddin vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 July, 2024

3] M.Cr.C. No.27593 of 2024 is the third bail application filed by applicant Aslam @ Bhaiyyu, and M.Cr.C. No.24509 of 2024 is the first bail application filed by the applicant Shabuddin (Shahbuddin) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as they are implicated in connection with Crime No.197/2023, registered at Police Station Khajrana, District Indore (MP) for offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 294, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicants are in custody since 18.08.2023 and 05.03.2023 respectively. 4] It is alleged against the applicants that both of them inflicted knife injuries on the deceased's thigh and back, resulting in his death. 5] Counsel for the applicants has emphasized that even assuming the case of the prosecution to be correct, there was no intention on the part of the applicants to cause the death of the deceased Sahil, as the injuries were inflicted on the lower limbs only. 6] In support of his submissions, Shri Naveen Kumar Singh counsel for the applicant Shahbuddin has also relied upon the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Harjinder Singh Alias Jinda Vs. Delhi Administration, reported as 1968 AIR 867, and Amiruddin Vs. State (Delhi Admn.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Manoj S/O Kishan vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 October, 2021

Learned counsel relies on the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in case of Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in (2018) 10 SCC 443, Rajesh Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of UP & Anr. reported in (2018) 10 SCC 472, Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as judgment passed by Delhi High Court in case of Amiruddin Vs. State reported in 2016 SCC Online 3202, to submit that the FIRs registered under Sections 498A & 406 IPC are usually over- implicated and statistics reveal that most of them are found to be false.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1