Delhi Development Authority vs Sh. Radhey on 9 September, 2020
6. It further appears that the present appellant has also
sought condonation of delay of 273 days, in filing the present
RCA DJ No. 161/2017
DDA V. Radhey
DOD : 09.09.2020 Page No.5 of 32
appeal, mainly, on the grounds that the Ld. Counsel for the
appellant due to inadvertence had misÂtagged the brief of the
present appeal, marked to him with another file of similar
nomenclature and therefore, appeal was not filed timely, due to
oversight. In the reply filed, to the application for condonation of
delay, the grounds taken by the present appellant for condonation
of delay, have been forcefully, controverted and even the earlier
Ld. Counsel for the present respondents, Sh. Gaurav Puri had filed
written arguments, in opposition to the application on 13.08.2020
but on 04.09.2020 a joint submission was made by the Ld.
Counsels for both sides, present, that the delay may be condoned
by this court and appeal may be taken up for adjudication on
merits thereafter. Hence, delay of 273 days in filing the present
appeal against the impugned order, dated 21.01.2017 stands
condoned in the interest of justice and appeal is now taken up for
final adjudication on merits.