Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 173 (2.51 seconds)
Documents citing Deepak Sibal & Ors vs Punjab University And Another on 14 February, 1989

Dr.Satish Menon vs Secretary The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 July, 2009

10. It is therefore clear that to enable women of this country, who for centuries were socially and economically handicapped to participate in the socio-economic activities on equal footing with men and to eliminate the backwardness of women, Article 15(3) provides that the State can make special provision for women. Such special provisions for women include reservation of seats in educational institutions or of posts in public employment in favour of women. According to Mr. Sanghi, however, no provision for reservation can be made of a single seat in an educational institution or a single post in public employment in favour of women as per the law laid down in M.R. Balaji Vs. State of Mysore, Deepak Sibal Vs. 7 Punjab University, Dr. Chakradhar Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigar Vs. Faculty Association & others (supra).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:07 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:10 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:24 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:51 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:03:00 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:21 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:46 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:57 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivam Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Ors. on 13 July, 2018

34. The judgment of the Apex Court in Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University & anr., (1989) 2 SCC 145, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners is distinguishable on facts because in that case the admission to law courses in evening College of Punjab University was denied to the employees of private/public establishments/ institutions on the ground of production of bogus certificates by them, imparting legal education to employees of government/semi-government institutions in public interest, continuity of service for 3 years period of State and elimination of wastage of seats. Such, however, is not the position in the case in hand nor the withdrawal of concession to the category of the ::: Downloaded on - 16/07/2018 23:02:54 :::HCHP 41 petitioners suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The ratio of the judgment, as such, is of no help to the case of the petitioners.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next