Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing Vilas Agaji Pawar And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 18 February, 2020

Dilip Hadale vs M/O Finance on 23 August, 2022

20. Learned counsel for respondents has also relied upon the recent judgment of the Mumbai Bench of this Tribunal in Vilas Pawar & others v. Union of India & others (O.A. No.701/2017 with connected O.A.) decided on 01.07.2022, where the similar issue was raised by the applicants. Vide a detailed judgment, the Tribunal dismissed the aforesaid O.As after referring the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court by both the parties.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vilas Agaji Pawar And Others vs The Union Of India Additional Solicitor ... on 12 January, 2024

In view of the above, we are left to ponder as to whether, the purpose of this recruitment drive, in the light of Sandip Pralhad Ingole (supra), as well as the order delivered at the Aurangabad Bench dated 30.08.2023 in Vilas Agaji Pawar (supra) and more specifically in the light of the directions of the Honourable Supreme Court vide it's order dated 13.07.2023 in Central Bank of India vs. Sandip Pralhad Ingole, was to absorb *31* 902wp379o24 long serving employees under the OTM or whether, the examinations are meant for eliminating such candidates, who are barely educated and semi-literate, paving the way for recruiting fresh hands since the Respondent Bank has declared in the advertisement that the existing temporaries/ casuals will have to compete with freshers. The very purpose of the OTM is lost if freshers are permitted to compete with the existing long serving employees like the Petitioners.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R V Ghuge - Full Document
1