Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.63 seconds)
Documents citing Shikhar Chand [D] Mamta Jain & Ors. vs Ramesh Kumar Judgement Given By: ... on 12 January, 2012

Ms. Mamta vs Sh. K.Moorthy on 4 April, 2015

5. It has further been re­affirmed by the plaintiff on affidavit that in her opinion, the defendant has got no defence to the suit of the plaintiff. Since the defendant has failed to file the application for leave to defend within the prescribed period of limitation, in my considered opinion, the plaintiff is entitled to the judgment forthwith in terms of provisions of Order 37 Rule 3 (6) (a). As has already been observed all the averments made by the plaintiff in his plaint are deemed to have been duly admitted by the defendant since the defendant has failed to apply for leave to defend. Even otherwise, the claim of the plaintiff is duly supported by documents and the same has been re­affirmed by the plaintiff in affidavit in support of her application seeking issuance of summons for judgment against CS No. 661/13 Mamta Vs. K. Moorthy Judgment dated 04.04.2015 Page no. 6 of 7 the defendant.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Mamta Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 8 November, 2023

"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.07.2023 by which the respondent no.2 has Ex-parte allowed the Recall Application Under Section - 209(h) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the Respondent No.4, against the order dated 03.07.2023 passed in Case No.02186 of 2020, Computerized Case No.T202014291102186 (Mamta and others vs. Ramesh), Under Section-34 of U.P. Revenue Code.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Mamta Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 20 November, 2023

"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.07.2023 by which the respondent no. 2 has Ex-parte allowed the Recall Application Under Section - 209(h) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the Respondent no. 4, against the order dated 03.07.2023 passed in Case No. 02185 of 2020, Computerized Case No. T202014291102185 (Mamta and others Vs. Ramesh), Under Section-34 of U.P. Revenue Code."
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Mamta Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 21 November, 2023

"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.07.2023 by which the respondent no.2 has Ex-parte allowed the Recall Application Under Section - 209(h) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the Respondent No.4, against the order dated 03.07.2023 passed in Case No.02184 of 2020, Computerized Case No.T202014291102184 (Mamta and others vs. Ramesh), Under Section-34 of U.P. Revenue Code.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1