Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Nanalal M. Varma And Co. (Gunnies) P. ... vs Gordhandas Jerambhai And Ors. on 22 May, 1964

15a. This rule is in consonance with the principle that where an order has not been perfected the Judge has power to reconsider it. The Judge has also the power to vary an order which has been drawn up; but not completed or filed: In the Matter of Steel Construction Co. Ltd., 39 Cal WN 1259. But once the order has been settled, passed and entered by the Registrar it can be varied only when it contains an adjudication on a matter on which the court never adjudicated thus bringing it into accordance with the order actually pronounced: Mulchand v. G.R. Martindale .
Calcutta High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Prabha Agarwal vs Aditi Oil Mill on 10 June, 2016

15a. This rule is in consonance with the principle that where an order has not been perfected the Judge has power to reconsider it. The Judge has also the power to vary an order which has been drawn up; but not completed or filed: In the Matter of Steel Construction Co. Ltd., 39 Cal WN 1259. But once the order has been settled, passed and entered by the Registrar it can be varied only when it contains an adjudication on a matter on which the court never adjudicated thus bringing it into accordance with the order actually pronounced: Mulchand v. G.R. Martindale, AIR 1928 Cal 756.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - A Banerjee - Full Document
1