Suman Lata vs Ndmc on 17 December, 2025
21.It is an undisputed fact that the workman had raised an
industrial dispute regarding her regularization on the post of
ANM, and in that respect a POIT No. 108/2017 titled as
"Kavita & 12 Others vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation,
bearing POIT No. 118/2017 is still pending adjudication. It is a
matter of record that the assertion of the workman was that
she was refused duties in the end of November, 2017, as per
the stand of the management and testimony of MW-1 the
services of the workman were terminated vide office order
dated 27.04.2017 Ex. MW1/2 w.e.f. 01.05.2017. The
contention of the workman through out has been that she had
attended to her post till November 2017. Pertinently
management failed to bring on record the authentic
attendance record of the workman. The contention of MW-1
in this regard was that he has not seen the attendance record
of the concerned workman for the period from April to
November, 2017 and he had not checked the records of Bazar
Sita Ram Dispensary (Ayurvedic). Be that as it may the fact
that the workman was terminated from service is not
disputed. As per Ex.MW1/2 the services of the workman was
terminated w.e.f. 01.05.2017. Taking the case of the Digitally signed
by SHARAD
SHARAD GUPTA
GUPTA Date: