Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (2.07 seconds)
Documents citing Parsoli Motors Works Private Limited vs Bmw India Private Litmited on 15 January, 2018

P.T.Asha vs Indian on 11 August, 2020

In yet another of its Judgement reported in 2018 (168) DRJ 650 – Parsoli Motors Works Private Limited Vs. BMW India Private Limited, the Delhi High Court was considering the non-renewal of the dealership agreement. After discussing the various Judgement on the point, the learned Judge held that the issue involved in the said proceedings is covered by the provisions of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act. The learned Judge has observed as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Saboo Cars Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Hyundai Motor India Ltd on 26 April, 2021

In yet another judgement in Parsoli Motors Works Private Limited Vs. BMW India Private Limited, reported in 2018 (168) DRJ 650, the Delhi High Court, while at the time of considering the non-renewal of the dealership agreement, after discussing the various judgment on the point, held that the issue involved in the said proceedings is covered by the provisions of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act and observed as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 1 - R Pongiappan - Full Document

Goodwill Non-Woven (P) Limited vs Xcoal Energy & Resources Llc on 9 June, 2020

& Process Engineering Co. & Anr. (supra), C.V. Rao (supra), Olex Focas Pvt. Ltd. (supra), Parsoli Motor Words Pvt. Ltd. (supra), Huawei Technologies Company Ltd. (supra), to contend that the powers to grant reliefs under Section 9 of the Act are not wider than the powers available to the Court to order such relief under CPC. Further, the petitioner has to establish / satisfy the Court that the respondent is attempting to remove or dispose of the assets with the intention of defeating the decree that may be passed and the discretion of the Court to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Act has to be exercised sparingly and in appropriate cases and the Court should be extremely cautious in granting interim relief and it should be based on materials on record leading to a definite conclusion that the respondent is likely to render the entire arbitration proceedings infructuous.
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 4 - V K Rao - Full Document

Abp Network Private Limited vs Malika Malhotra on 12 October, 2021

12. Re. Section 14(d) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 12.1 Mr. Baruah relies on Rajasthan Breweries Ltd v. Stroh Brewery Co.1, Parsoli Motor Works v. B.M.W. India Pvt Ltd2, Independent News Service v. Anuraag Muskan3, Ambiance India Pvt Ltd v. Naveen Jain4, G.E. Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd v. Tarun Bhargava5 and L.M. Khosla v. Thai Airways International Public Co. Ltd6.
Delhi High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 9 - C H Shankar - Full Document
1