Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.32 seconds)

Narinder Kumar Bhatia vs . Balbir Singh Bhatia on 11 July, 2022

5. I have considered the submissions of both parties and have gone through the Trial Court record. The brief facts of the case as per the complainant are that complainant advanced a friendly loan in the sum of Rs.1,80,000/- to the accused in January, 2014 for a period of six months. In discharge of the said loan liability, the accused had issued nine postdated cheques in favour of the complainant, for amount of Rs.20,000/- each. The said cheques were bounced when presented by the complainant Criminal Revision No.28/2022 Page No. 3 of 6 Narinder Kumar Bhatia Vs. Balbir Singh Bhatia seeking repayment of the loan. The accused had not repaid the loan amount despite request by the complainant and legal notice, therefore, complaint case under Section 138 NI Act was filed.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sohnu Mohan vs Ramona Jind & Ors on 25 March, 2025

49. However, before proceeding to direct the concerned parties to file their Affidavits of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities, the question that also needs to be addressed is that whether the applicant/defendant no.2 can claim maintenance by moving an application under Section 151 CPC in the present suit. This question need not detain this Court any longer as the issue is no Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH CS(OS) 2338/2013 Page 17 of 33 ASWAL Signing Date:27.03.2025 04:04:19 more res integra. This Court in Jagjit Singh Bhatia (supra), has observed that the relief available to a party to the suit in terms of the Section 20 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act can be sought in proceedings of a partition suit by way of an application. The relevant extract from the said decision reads thus:
Delhi High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1