Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing K. L. Manhas vs Union Of India & Others on 11 May, 2010

Unknown vs Union Of India on 21 March, 2011

36. Applicant Shri Manhas did not invite our attention to any factual inaccuracy in the averment aforementioned. We cannot, thus, find any fault with the competence of the Government of Haryana in creating the post of OSD(Rules) and the declaration of that post to be equivalent to that of the PCCF. The creation of that post, and also the declaration of its equivalence to the PCCF, is affirmed and no interference in this regard is required by this Tribunal. That disposes of O.A.No.1052-HR of 2010 titled K.L.Manhas vs. Union f India.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dev Ram Jha vs Shri Moti Nath Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya ... on 30 September, 2024

7. Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with interest @ 6% to the Petitioner from the date the retiral benefits became due till actual payments along with cost of Rs.20,000/-, in view of the settled law that an employee is entitled to interest on delayed payments of retiral benefits, where there is unjustifiable delay on part of the employer. [Ref.: Padma Nath v. State of West Bengal and Others, 2019 SCC OnLine Cal 2185; Vijay L. Mehrotra v. State of U.P. and Others, (2001) 9 SCC 687; Dr. A. Selvaraj v. C.B.M. College and Others, (2022) 4 SCC 627; K.L. Manhas v. Union of India and Ors., 2015 SCC OnLine Del 12258 and Single Benches in R.P. Tak v. Secretary, Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises and Anr., 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10760 and H.N. Sharma and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors., W.P. (C) 1724/2017, decided on 21.08.2020]. Cost and interest shall be borne by Respondents No. 1.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Coram : Hon Ble Ms. Shyama Dogra vs Union Of India Through The Secretary To ... on 16 November, 2010

HONBLE MS.SHYAMA DOGRA, MEMBER (J) Heard applicant in person. Before filing the present O.A. the applicant had filed an O.A.No. 411-HR-2010 titled K.L. Manhas vs. Union of India & Others, challenging the order dated 4.2.2010 by which the applicant, while working as the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) was ordered to be posted as the Managing Director, Haryana Forest Development Corporation, Panchkula. The said O.A. was dismissed on 25.5.2010 (Annexure A-11) by passing the following orders:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1