Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 150 (1.04 seconds)
Documents citing Kamatchi vs Lakshmi Narayanan on 13 April, 2022

Amit Prabhakar Dhawale And Ors vs Pallavi Amit Dhawale And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Nitesh Hindurao Galave vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Ravindra Prataap Vichare And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Sullaja Firodia Motwani And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Lilavati Shantilal Modi And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Shivraj Bapusaheb Bhosale And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Amit Prabhakar Dhawale And Ors vs Pallavi Amit Dhawale And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Sanjeev Ramesh Doshi And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document

Lincen Louis Thommana And Ors vs Leena Lincen Thommana (Maiden Name ... on 26 February, 2024

In my view, therefore, it cannot be said that Hon'ble Apex Court in Kamatchi's case, has not considered the issue of maintainability of the proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Full Bench of Madras High Court has heavily relied upon decision in Kamatchi's case (supra) to conclude that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C challenging the proceeding under Section 12 of D.V. Act is not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - S U Deshmukh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next