Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (1.72 seconds)

Chandanmalnagaraj, Chennai vs Acit Non Corporate Circle 4(1), Chennai on 13 March, 2019

9. The undisputed facts in this case include that the AO issued notice of demand u/s.156 of the Act as well as issue of notice u/s.274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act at the stage of making draft assessment order as per the provisions of section 144C(1) of the Act. Normally, such notices are issued at the end of the assessment proceedings and at the time of making assessment order. The fact that demand is raised is evident on the fact of draft assessment order which bears the entry of the demand in the register of Demand Collection and Balance (DCR 02/45, dated 20-2-13). The notice u/s.274 of the Act is found issued for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. On law, it is settled legal proposition at the level of High Courts that the assessment orders based on such draft assessment orders not following the mandatory provisions of section 144C of the Act is without jurisdiction and therefore, null and void and not enforceable in law. Further, the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s. Zuari Cements Ltd. Vs. ACIT in Writ Petition No.5557/2012, dated 21-02- 2013 held that the impugned order dated 12-12-2011 passed by the respondent was :- 22 -: IT(TP)A No.80 /2018 contrary to the mandatory provisions of section 144C of the Act is declared as one without jurisdiction, null and void and unenforceable. (SLP filed against the judgment of AP High Court in the case of ACIT Vs. M/s. Zuari Cements Ltd. by the Revenue stands dismissed on this issue).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Walter Tools India Private Ltd.,, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, on 16 March, 2018

), following the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Zuari Cement Ltd. v. ACIT (supra), the Madras High Court in Vijay Television (P) Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel, Chennai (supra) as well as the Bombay High Court in International Air Transport Association v. DCIT (2016) 290 CTR (Bom) 46, came to the same conclusion."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Eaton Industrial Systems Pvt. ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, on 12 April, 2018

), following the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Zuari Cement Ltd. v. ACIT (supra), the Madras High Court in Vijay Television (P) Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel, Chennai (supra) as well as the Bombay High Court in International Air Transport Association v. DCIT (2016) 290 CTR (Bom) 46, came to the same conclusion."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kohler Power (I) P Ltd (Earlier Known As ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 26 August, 2019

Reliance is placed on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in International Air Transport Association Vs. DCIT (supra) and the Hon'ble Madras High Court in Vijay Television Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DRP & Others (supra) and the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in M/s. Zuari Cements Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra). We hold that the assessment order passed in the case is invalid and the same is set aside. Since we have decided the preliminary issue in favour of assessee, the other grounds of appeal against the additions made become academic and the same are dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Walter Tools India Private Limited,, ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 23 January, 2018

Reliance is placed on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in International Air Transport Association Vs. DCIT (supra) and the Hon'ble Madras High Court in Vijay Television Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DRP & Others (supra) and the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in M/s. Zuari Cements Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra). We hold that the assessment order passed in the case is invalid and the same is set aside. Since we have decided the preliminary issue in favour of assessee, the other grounds of appeal against the additions made become academic and the same are dismissed."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Panji Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Cyient Limited (Formerly Infotech ... vs Dcit, Circle-2(1), Hyd, Hyderabad on 29 December, 2017

), following the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Zuari Cement Ltd. v. ACIT (supra), the Madras High Court in Vijay Television (P) Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel, Chennai (supra) as well as the Bombay High Court in International Air Transport Association v. DCIT (2016) 290 CTR (Bom) 46, came to the same conclusion."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 26 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next