Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)
Documents citing Karnail Singh vs Punjab State Electricity Board And ... on 29 March, 2011

Jagjit Kumar Batra vs State Of Punjab And Others on 26 April, 2022

The law on the said issue is also clearly settled by the Division Bench of this Court, while passing order in CWP-20178-2003, titled as "Karnail Singh Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and others", decided on 12.01.2006, wherein also, where a promotion to the employee was not granted by the Department and the non-grant of the promotion was due to the fault of the Department only, the employee was held entitled for the consequential benefits along with the arrears. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Narinder Nath Sudan vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 31 March, 2016

3. The fact of the matter is that petitioner has been promoted with effect from the date his junior was promoted. The grievance stands redressed. However, the arrears of difference of salary have been denied by invoking the principle of 'no work, no pay' against the petitioner. It is well settled that this principle cannot be applied in cases of retrospective promotions to cure right deprivation suffered in the past when claim was wrongly ignored. There is sufficient judicial precedent to support the proposition including in Union of India v. K.V. Jankiraman, AIR 1991 SC 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2016 00:03:31 ::: CWP No.2288 of 2015 -2- 2010 as well the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Karnail Singh v. Punjab State Electricity Board & ors., 2006(4) RSJ 671 by applying the law in Paluru Ramkrishnaiah v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 166 and K.V. Jankiraman's case (supra), full salary will become available to the petitioner as a matter of right.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - R N Raina - Full Document
1