Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)

Naresh Kumar (Deceased) Through Lrs vs . Deepak Solanki & Ors. on 18 December, 2018

27) The burden to prove this issue was upon the plaintiff.   Reliance has been made upon the cross­examination of defendant / DW1, wherein he has duly admitted that at present the suit property is in possession of the plaintiff. On perusal of the cross­examination of DW1 dt. 26.05.16, it is very clear that the defendant has categorically admitted that at present   the   suit   property   is   in   possession   of   plaintiff.   Again,   the defendant has also admitted the site plan filed by the plaintiff as Ex. PW1/1   and   moreover,   from   the   revenue   record   including   khasra girdwari   i.e.   Ex.   PW4/1   (colly),   it   is   further   clear   that  the   plaintiff alongwith his brother and sisters has been in possession of the property situated in khasra no. 22/9. Accordingly, it is clearly established from      Civil Suit No:­    96570/16                                                           (Vivek Kumar Agarwal)                                 CJ­07(C)/THC/Delhi 14 Naresh Kumar (deceased) through LRs vs. Deepak Solanki & Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shujauddin vs Mrs Laiquan Nisha on 19 November, 2025

19. Ld counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon the judgment passed in the matter of Satender Jain vs Satya Narain Sanjiv Gupta HUF (RSA 139/2019) whereby the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi placing reliance upon the judgment passed by the full bench of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Punna Ram & ors Vs Chiranji Lal Gupta & ors AIR 1982 CS No. 160/2022 Shujauddin vs. Mrs. Laiquan Nisa Page no. 14/18 Delhi 431 and also in the matter of Giri Raj (since deceased) through LRs vs Deepak Gupta and others RSA 151/2012 vide para 29 has held as follows:
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1