Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 893 (7.35 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. And Anr vs M/S. Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd. And ... on 18 July, 1991

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board vs Kushal Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Narender ... on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board vs Himansi Bhati D/O Bhagwat Singh on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board vs Atma Ram S/O Shri Chandra Bhan on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board vs Sushila Saini D/O Nathu Ram Saini on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Secretary vs Krishan Kumar Choudhary Son Of Shri ... on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Secretary, Rajasthan Service ... vs Dinesh Yadav Son Of Shri Ram Lal Yadav on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Moti Singh S/O Ranaram vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board on 13 October, 2025

Further, approving the decision of this Court in MCD v. Gurnam Kaur [MCD v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101] which held that "precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment" this Court held [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289] that : (Synthetics & Chemicals case [State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289], SCC p.163, para 41) "41. ... A decision which is not express and is not founded on reasons nor it proceeds on consideration of issue cannot be deemed to be a law declared to have a binding effect as is contemplated by Article
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next