Smt. Nirmala Baxi vs Ito on 28 February, 2003
(d) Choudhary Construction Co. v. Dy Commr (A), Commercial Taxes department & Ors. (2002) 127 STC 47 (Raj).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)Documents citing
Choudhary Construction Company vs The Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), ... on 4 October, 2001
M/S Azad Coach Pvt Ltd vs State Of Raj And Anr on 29 November, 2016
accepting or denying interim relief claimed by the
petitioner. The issue aforesaid has already been
decided by this court in the case of Rajasthan
Spinning And Weaving Mills Limited (supra) and
Choudhary Construction Company (supra). It has been
held that while passing the order for interim relief,
reasons should be assigned for denying or accepting
the relief. A perusal of the order under challenge does
not specify reasons for grant of partial interim relief to
the petitioner.
M/S Azad Coach Pvt Ltd vs State Of Raj And Anr on 29 November, 2016
accepting or denying interim relief claimed by the
petitioner. The issue aforesaid has already been
decided by this court in the case of Rajasthan
Spinning And Weaving Mills Limited (supra) and
Choudhary Construction Company (supra). It has been
held that while passing the order for interim relief,
reasons should be assigned for denying or accepting
the relief. A perusal of the order under challenge does
not specify reasons for grant of partial interim relief to
the petitioner.
M/S Azad Coach Pvt Ltd vs State Of Raj And Anr on 29 November, 2016
accepting or denying interim relief claimed by the
petitioner. The issue aforesaid has already been
decided by this court in the case of Rajasthan
Spinning And Weaving Mills Limited (supra) and
Choudhary Construction Company (supra). It has been
held that while passing the order for interim relief,
reasons should be assigned for denying or accepting
the relief. A perusal of the order under challenge does
not specify reasons for grant of partial interim relief to
the petitioner.
M/S Azad Coach Pvt Ltd vs State Of Raj And Anr on 29 November, 2016
accepting or denying interim relief claimed by the
petitioner. The issue aforesaid has already been
decided by this court in the case of Rajasthan
Spinning And Weaving Mills Limited (supra) and
Choudhary Construction Company (supra). It has been
held that while passing the order for interim relief,
reasons should be assigned for denying or accepting
the relief. A perusal of the order under challenge does
not specify reasons for grant of partial interim relief to
the petitioner.
1