Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Tarsem Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Others on 31 March, 2022

Manoj Kumar vs Comm. Of Police on 11 April, 2022

In the judgment in the case of Tarsem Singh v. State of Punjab & Others2, this Court has categorically held that when the Authority is of the opinion that it is not reasonably practicable to hold inquiry, such finding shall be recorded on the subjective satisfaction by the authority, and same must be based on the objective criteria. In the aforesaid case, it is 29 O.A. No.2336/2018 and 2829/2019 further held that 10 reasons for dispensing with the inquiry must be supported by material."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajumiya Hanif Saiyed vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2022

In the case of Tarsem Singh v. State of Punjab and others (Supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court has specifically held that formal inquiry was dispensed with only on the ground that the witnesses could be win over would not be the ground and particularly, in the present case where witnesses are the persons of the higher rank Officers, has held in paragraph 11 which reads as under :-
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A J Desai - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs Comm. Of Police on 24 January, 2023

In the judgment in the case of Tarsem Singh v. State of Punjab & Others2, this Court has categorically held that when the Authority is of the opinion that it is not reasonably practicable to hold inquiry, such finding shall be recorded on the subjective satisfaction by the authority, and same must be based on the objective criteria. In the aforesaid case, it is further held that 10 reasons for dispensing with the inquiry must be supported by material."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1