Batakrushna Sahoo vs Commissioner on 25 July, 2022
4. In his opposition, Mr.Sonak Mishra, learned Additional
Standing Counsel appearing for the State opposite parties while
attempting to justify the revisional order took this Court to the
provision at Section 37(1)of the Act, 1972 and attempted to
explain that under the provision the Revisional authority has
enormous power and such a proceeding can be initiated at any
Page 4 of 15
// 5 //
stage of the matter and at any point of time. Further taking this
Court to the discussions and findings of the Revisional authority,
an attempt is also made to satisfy the Court that the Revisional
authority since made an attempt to correct the irregularity, there is
no harm in exercise of such jurisdiction as no illegality should be
allowed to be perpetuated on the guise of technicalities. Taking
this Court through a Division Bench decision of this Court in the
case of Manas Ranjan Das And Ors. Vs. Consolidation Officer
And Ors. Mr.Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel
attempted to take support of the impugned order.